You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This library appears to be the de-facto standard for approximate comparisons. Downstreams include ndarray and nalgebra. I just ran into an issue where ndarray is using an older version tied to an older version of num-complex. If you aren't planning on making breaking changes then it would be nice if you could bump to a 1.0 version so that feature additions don't require upstreams to bump their versions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Bumping approx to a 1.0 version won’t solve the num-complex problem. Using a new version of num-complex will still require a major version bump of approx, even if no breaking change is done on approx itself.
As you can see I actually opened a similar issue with num-complex for that reason. That being said I think there is still value in this crate considering doing it as well.
This library appears to be the de-facto standard for approximate comparisons. Downstreams include ndarray and nalgebra. I just ran into an issue where ndarray is using an older version tied to an older version of num-complex. If you aren't planning on making breaking changes then it would be nice if you could bump to a 1.0 version so that feature additions don't require upstreams to bump their versions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: