Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Research] EVM address quirks #20

Open
brianleect opened this issue Mar 26, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

[Research] EVM address quirks #20

brianleect opened this issue Mar 26, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@brianleect
Copy link
Owner

brianleect commented Mar 26, 2023

Considering nature of EVM where addresses being accessible/controlled by a private key on one chain is usually indicative of it being controlled on all other chains, it might not make sense to have labels completely segregated by chains. It might make sense to treat a label on etherscan to be equally valid as one found on bscscan or polygonscan.

Todo

  1. Determine number of overlapping addresses and whether its worthwhile to combine them?

Edge case: Old gnosis multi-sig deployed by nonce of the contract rather than address of sender. We have a counter example here where a contract address can be owned by a differing address, but this is likely an extreme edge case

@brianleect brianleect added the question Further information is requested label Mar 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant