You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
as of carbonplan/offsets-db-api#118, we now have additional (beneficiary, note, account, reason) fields in the /credits/ endpoint's payload. should we go ahead and add these fields to the project-level credit view, or should we wait until we have figured out how the search on these fields is going to work?
Practically, I think there's some design work to think through because it's not totally obvious where in the 6-column credits table this info will go, and we don't have a lot of front-end/design capacity right now.
Straw man proposal: Could we add beneficiary info to an expander, similar to expander pattern on the landing page?
An issue to consider when we integrate search is: how do we make it clear why a project was included in search results. Right now, we're just searching fields that are already visible in the projects table.
To solve this problem on the project-specific page, we could add filtering to the credits table, and pass through search as a query param to the project view (i.e. /projects/[id]?search=[beneficiary query]).
To solve this problem on the landing page: I think this might require some more thought! Is it possible to include a summary of beneficiaries on the project? Does database-wide beneficiary search ultimately belong on a credits-specific page?
as of carbonplan/offsets-db-api#118, we now have additional (
beneficiary
,note
,account
,reason
) fields in the/credits/
endpoint's payload. should we go ahead and add these fields to the project-level credit view, or should we wait until we have figured out how the search on these fields is going to work?Cc @katamartin / @badgley
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: