You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A big confusion/complaint we recieve, not just about how the indicator is a property of the ImagingPlane (this is currently fixed in ndx-microscopy design) but also how the emission_lambda is (a) not a scalar and (b) a spectrum known from the indicator
Instead, it seems that the intention of this value is to represent the 'median wavelength selected by the optical filter'; I've also needed or wanted to attach bounds on that filtering as indicated by the methods section of multiple papers
As such I'd propose changing the name to something like filter_wavelength_median and also add filter_wavelength_range (or @alessandratrapani preferred 'bandwidth') which is a [2] (float) with both properties in units of nanometers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
CodyCBakerPhD
changed the title
Change name of emission wavelength ob the OpticalChannel
Change name of emission wavelength on the OpticalChannel
Dec 18, 2023
A big confusion/complaint we recieve, not just about how the
indicator
is a property of theImagingPlane
(this is currently fixed inndx-microscopy
design) but also how theemission_lambda
is (a) not a scalar and (b) a spectrum known from the indicatorInstead, it seems that the intention of this value is to represent the 'median wavelength selected by the optical filter'; I've also needed or wanted to attach bounds on that filtering as indicated by the methods section of multiple papers
As such I'd propose changing the name to something like
filter_wavelength_median
and also addfilter_wavelength_range
(or @alessandratrapani preferred 'bandwidth') which is a[2] (float)
with both properties inunits
ofnanometers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: