Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Size of Open Source #16

Closed
chadwhitacre opened this issue Jan 22, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

Size of Open Source #16

chadwhitacre opened this issue Jan 22, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Owner

chadwhitacre commented Jan 22, 2024

Read "The Value of Open Source Software." (h/t, also)

Revisit "Open Source Captures 0.02% of the Value it Creates, Leaving $852B/yr on the Table."

SSRN-id4693148.pdf


Tracking

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Owner Author

I read it, starting a post, two big questions:

  1. "Buy, borrow, build" — If borrow is off the table, why assume that all companies have to individually rebuild all OSS from scratch vs. buying from others? Seems a big impact on demand number.
  2. Also on the demand side, why is Go such a big bar?

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Owner Author

Questioning “The Value of Open Source Software”
The new HBS working paper seems fundamentally flawed to me, though it has some helpful parts.

@coni2k
Copy link

coni2k commented Jan 27, 2024

Questioning “The Value of Open Source Software” The new HBS working paper seems fundamentally flawed to me, though it has some helpful parts.

My two cents: I don't think the demand value calculation is meant to be taken literally. I took it as the upper limit of the cost parameter. As you mentioned, that situation can never happen in practice due to the usual market dynamics. However, having such a figure could give us better estimations in the future, or if we could periodically calculate these figures, we could get a better understanding based on the changes in time.

My suggestion is to base the value of open technologies on closed/proprietary technologies, at least as a starting point. Add a 1% consumption tax on closed tech to generate at least an entry-level, steady revenue for open tech. What the upper limit should be (2 percent, 5, 10, or more) requires a lengthier discussion. But, in short, I'm also much more close to Nordhaus & Goods-Market Valuation approach:

This method builds on suggestions from Nordhaus (2006, p. 146) who says "…the price of market and nonmarket goods and services should be imputed on the basis of the comparable market goods and services."

It would be great to see the study's model/data so we could also review the results. Indeed, the Go language results seem like a strange outlier.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Owner Author

demand value calculation is meant to be taken literally

Over on LinkedIn I see Frank saying, "the true number is likely much higher!" 🙄

It would be great to see the study's model/data so we could also review the results.

💯

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Owner Author

Cross-linking to #20 (comment) for additional commentary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants