-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
scontrol CLI rewrite #6
Comments
Since the scontrol output format is key=value, i find the current input format idea for using copy/paste to update records. Asking the user to input a specific missing field (the reason a node is being drained) is a good idea |
To set individual flags/attributes:
|
lipari
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Sep 13, 2011
Bug in selec/cons_res using tasks-per-node and cpus-per-task
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
It seems like the scontrol command line interface could be greatly improved. I think that the whole key=value model could be replaced with a more hierarchical command set like you see out of command like svn, git, etc.
For instance, instead of:
it could be:
Notice that the "-m" is an option. Just like with svn and git, if you leave that out it should prompt you for a reason (if reasons are required):
I suspect that if we took an orderly approach to examining scontrol's current command set, we could design a user interface that is much nicer to use.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: