These are some general guidelines and information related to how we contribute to GrimoireLab. You can read about it from the CONTRIBUTING.md.
Some of your contributions will require a changelog entry which explains the motivation of the change. These entries would be included in the release notes to explain users and developers about the new features or bugs fixed in the software. This is an example of changelog entry:
title: 'Fix bug casting spells on magicians'
category: fixed
author: John Smith <jsmith@example.com>
issue: 666
notes: >
The bug was making impossible to cast a spell on
a magician.
Changelog entries will be written to explain what was changed and why, not how. Take into account not everybody is a developer and they are meant to reach a wider audience.
Changelog entries are required for:
- Code changes that directly affects the GrimoireLab users.
- Bug fixes.
- New updates.
- Performance improvements.
Changelog entries are not required for
- Docs-only (e.g., README.md) changes.
- Developer-facing change (e.g., test suite changes).
- Code refactoring.
These changelog entries should be written to the releases/unreleased/
directory. The file is expected to be a YAML file
in the following format:
title: 'Fix bug casting spells on magicians'
category: fixed
author: John Smith <jsmith@example.com>
issue: 666
notes: >
The bug was making impossible to cast a spell on
a magician.
The title
field has the name of the change. This is a mandatory field.
The category
field maps the category of the change, valid options are:
added, fixed, changed, deprecated, removed, security, performance, other.
This field is mandatory.
The author
key (format: Your Name <YourName@example.org>
) is used to
give attribution to community contributors. This is an optional field but
the Community contributors are encouraged to add their names.
The issue
value is a reference to the issue, if any, that is targeted
with this change. This is an optional field.
The notes
field should have a description explaining the changes in the
code. Remember you can write blocks of text using the >
character at the
beginning of each block. See the above given example.
Contributors can use the interactive changelog tool for this purpose which generates the changelog entry file automatically.
A good changelog entry should be descriptive and concise. It should explain the change to a reader who has zero context about the change. If you have trouble making it both concise and descriptive, err on the side of descriptive.
Use your best judgment and try to put yourself in the mindset of someone reading the compiled changelog. Does this entry add value? Does it offer context about what and why the change was made?
- Bad: Go to a project order.
- Good: Show a user’s starred projects at the top of the “Go to project” dropdown.
The first example provides no context of where the change was made, or why, or how it benefits the user.
- Bad: Copy (some text) to clipboard.
- Good: Update the “Copy to clipboard” tooltip to indicate what’s being copied.
Again, the first example is too vague and provides no context.
- Bad: Fixes and Improves CSS and HTML problems in mini pipeline graph and builds dropdown.
- Good: Fix tooltips and hover states in mini pipeline graph and builds dropdown.
The first example is too focused on implementation details. The user doesn’t care that we changed CSS and HTML, they care about the result of those changes.
- Bad: Strip out
nil
s in the Array of Commit objects returned fromfind_commits_by_message_with_elastic
- Good: Fix 500 errors caused by Elasticsearch results referencing garbage-collected commits
The first example focuses on how we fixed something, not on what it fixes. The rewritten version clearly describes the end benefit to the user (fewer 500 errors), and when (searching commits with Elasticsearch).