Replies: 2 comments
-
Somewhere else @chen-rn was already discussing this. I am strongly in favour of switching to pnpm since it's the fastest package manager out there right now. It should be really easy to migrate to pnpm, if you want to make a new branch, you are more than welcome 😍 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Gotcha, wait for pr
…On Thu, Mar 9, 2023, 15:37 Alberto ***@***.***> wrote:
Somewhere else @chen-rn <https://github.com/chen-rn> was already
discussing this. I am strongly in favour of switching to pnpm since it's
the fastest package manager out there right now. It should be really easy
to migrate to pnpm, if you want to make a new branch, you are more than
welcome 😍
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#55 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMGF6R6CT27C3VV7CW6DOUDW3GQFZANCNFSM6AAAAAAVUVP72U>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi there!
I'm still digging through your code, and I found out that you are using yarn. I believe that pnpm is better suited for monorepo due to its work with workspaces.
Some reference: https://nhost.io/blog/how-we-configured-pnpm-and-turborepo-for-our-monorepo
What do you think?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions