You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I having been using the schema to get the conns for wires like so: I take my wire, then I search the list of nodes for the wire, then I use the node to get the conns. Many wires pull up a node with multiple wires-that's great. Some wires pull up a node that only contains one wire: itself-also great. However, some wires do not seem to be associated with nodes at all (and this is the same in Vivado). The thing is that ISE shows that these wires do still have conns. Is there another way to use the schema to generate the conns?
For example, in the part xc7a100tcsg324-1, these wires do not have nodes:
I having been using the schema to get the conns for wires like so: I take my wire, then I search the list of nodes for the wire, then I use the node to get the conns. Many wires pull up a node with multiple wires-that's great. Some wires pull up a node that only contains one wire: itself-also great. However, some wires do not seem to be associated with nodes at all (and this is the same in Vivado). The thing is that ISE shows that these wires do still have conns. Is there another way to use the schema to generate the conns?
For example, in the part xc7a100tcsg324-1, these wires do not have nodes:
For wires that do not have nodes in interchange, I double checked in Vivado with tcl like so:
ISE lists this wire like so:
So I am just wondering if there is another way to get wire conns from the schema information that maybe I am missing?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: