Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

distant-ssh DistantChannel low ability to write files concurrently #227

Closed
baoyachi opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on

Comments

@baoyachi
Copy link

baoyachi commented Aug 3, 2023

Concurrent write at the same time, limited to 8 count.

At present, it seems that the reason for this is:https://github.com/wez/wezterm/blob/main/wezterm-ssh/src/session.rs#L89-L90

impl Session {
    pub fn connect(config: ConfigMap) -> anyhow::Result<(Self, Receiver<SessionEvent>)> {
+        let (tx_event, rx_event) = bounded(8);
+        let (tx_req, rx_req) = bounded(8);
...
    }
)
@chipsenkbeil
Copy link
Owner

chipsenkbeil commented Aug 3, 2023

I can't control that. You'd need to file with @wez. Open an issue against https://github.com/wez/wezterm, which contains the wezterm-ssh crate.

Alternatively, this may get solved if/when we switch over to using russh: #193.

@chipsenkbeil
Copy link
Owner

Closing out as this is for a dependency and not distant itself.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 1, 2023

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 1, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
wontfix This will not be worked on
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants