neo4jtools (work in progress)

A lightweight framework for working with embedded Neo4j graph database instances. The main focus lies on object-graph-mapping routines. Contrary to neo4j-ogm neo4jtools doesn't operate "over the wire". It loads and saves objects directly from and to GraphDatabaseService instances based upon mapping annotations on entity classes. Whole (uniformly typed) object graphs can be (lazily) retrieved by an Iterable<T> given by mapping through the results of a traversal. That is, the Cypher Query Language won't be needed for this.

Build
Modelling entities with annotations
Mapping the identity
Mapping properties
Mapping relationships 1. one-to-many 2. many-to-many 3. one-to-one
The ObjectGraphMapper
Saving an entity (graph) 1. Saving a single entity 2. Saving an entity graph 3. SingleLink constraint violations 4. Non-nullable properties 5. Automatic IDs 6. Optimistic locking
Database roundtrips (loading and saving) 1. Some limitations and pitfalls

1. Build

Maven is required to compile the library. Use

$ mvn clean install

to build the library along with the unit tests.

TOC

2. Modelling entities with annotations

To illustrate the provided basic object-graph-mapping facilities, I'll make use of a simple domain model consisting of Accounts, Roles, Keyrings, Keyitems and Documents. A particular Account may fulfill multiple Roles. A certain Role can be fulfilled by multiple Accounts, that is we have a many-to-many relationship between Accounts and Roles. An Account might own a Keyring whereas a Keyring always belongs to an Account. A Keyring may contain some Keyitems. Furthermore an Account has Documents. Documents are divided into Plaintext Documents and Encrypted Documents. See the UML class diagram below:

2.i Mapping the identity

Neo4j 2.x has added (optional) schema support. Neo4jtools uses some of these features to map the application managed object identity. The index definition below

GraphDatabaseService graphDatabaseService = new GraphDatabaseFactory()
    .newEmbeddedDatabaseBuilder(DB_PATH)
    .newGraphDatabase();
try (Transaction transaction = graphDatabaseService.beginTx()) {
  Schema schema = graphDatabaseService.schema();
  schema.indexFor(MyLabels.ACCOUNTS)
      .on("commonName")
      .create();
  transaction.success();
}

creates an index for Account nodes labelled with MyLabels.ACCOUNTS on the property commonName. Entity classes must be annotated with the NodeEntity annotation which calls for a label associated with the corresponding entity. Since the domain specific labels cannot be known beforehand, Labels must be provided by a String literal. Now the following definition of the Account entity class

@NodeEntity(label = "ACCOUNTS")
public class Account {
  @Id @Property(name = "commonName") private String userId;
...
}

maps the String field userId onto the mentioned property commonName. Assuming an object identity given by a Long field, ids can be generated automatically by a service:

@NodeEntity(label = "DOCUMENTS")
public class Document {
  @Id @Property @GeneratedValue private Long id;
...
}

2.ii Mapping properties

Fields annotated with Property are mapped on corresponding node properties. Since Neo4j supports only primitives like int, long together with java.lang.String as value types, it is an error to place a Property annotation onto a complex type (like e.g. java.math.BigInteger). By default a field annotated with Property is considered as non-nullable. An example for a nullable field is shown below:

@NodeEntity(label = "KEY_RINGS")
public class KeyRing {
...
  @Property(nullable = true) private String password;
...
}

Properties are key-value pairs. By default a field will be mapped on the property given by taking the field name as key. If this is inappropriate, the desired key must be explicitly provided, see the example below:

@NodeEntity(label = "ACCOUNTS")
public class Account {
  @Id @Property(name = "commonName") private String userId;
...
}

2.iii Mapping relationships

Neo4jtools provides two different annotations to model relationships: Links and SingleLink. With combinations of these annotations someone is able to map one-to-many, many-to-many and one-to-one relationships.

2.iii.a one-to-many

An example for a one-to-many relationship is the relationship between a Keyring and its Keyitems. From a perspective of a graph database, a Keyring node might have zero, one or multiple (directed) contains edges leading to Keyitem nodes. On the other hand every Keyitem node exhibits exactly one contains edge incoming from a Keyring node. The Keyring entity class makes use of the Links annotation whereas the Keyitem entity class utilizes the SingleLink, see the example below:

@NodeEntity(label = "KEY_RINGS")
public class KeyRing {
...
  @Links(direction = Direction.OUTGOING, type = "CONTAINS")
  private Collection<KeyItem> keyItems;
...
}

The data type of a field annotated with a SingleLink is Cell<?>. This is a container which is able to hold a single entity. There is a reason for not using directly entity types: Consider the loading of an entity instance from the graph database. All fields annotated with Links and SingleLinks will initially preset with proxy objects. Otherwise such a load might resolve the whole database.

@NodeEntity(label = "KEY_ITEMS")
public class KeyItem {
...
  @SingleLink(direction = Direction.INCOMING, type = "CONTAINS")
  private Cell<KeyRing> keyRing;
...
  public KeyRing getKeyRing() {
    return this.keyRing != null ? this.keyRing.getEntity() : null;
  }
  public void setKeyRing(KeyRing keyRing) {
    this.keyRing = new Wrapper<>(keyRing);
  }
...
}

Another example for one-to-many relationship is the relationship between an Account and its Documents:

@NodeEntity(label = "ACCOUNTS")
public class Account {
...
  @Links(direction = Direction.OUTGOING, type = "HAS")
  Collection<Document> documents;
...
}

@NodeEntity(label = "DOCUMENTS")
public class Document {
...
  @SingleLink(direction = Direction.INCOMING, type = "HAS")
  private Cell<Account> account;
...
}

2.iii.b many-to-many

Many-to-many relationships are modelled with Links annotations on both sides. Indeed an Account node might have multiple FULFILLS edges leading to various Role nodes whereas a certain Role node might has multiple incoming FULFILLS edges from different Account nodes:

@NodeEntity(label = "ACCOUNTS")
public class Account {
...  
  @Links(direction = Direction.OUTGOING, type = "FULFILLS")
  private Collection<Role> roles;
}

@NodeEntity(label = "ROLES")
public class Role {
...
  @Links(direction = Direction.INCOMING, type = "FULFILLS")
  private Collection<Account> accounts;
...
}

2.iii.c one-to-one

As one might expect, one-to-one relationships are modelled with SingleLinks on both sides. An example for a one-to-one relationship is the association between an Account and its Keyring. Whereas an Account didn't need necessarily a Keyring, a Keyring comes only together with an Account. That is, the SingleLink on the Account side is nullable:

@NodeEntity(label = "ACCOUNTS")
public class Account {
...  
  @SingleLink(direction = Direction.OUTGOING, type = "OWNS", nullable = true)
  private Cell<KeyRing> keyRing;
...
}

@NodeEntity(label = "KEY_RINGS")
public class KeyRing {
...
  @SingleLink(direction = Direction.INCOMING, type = "OWNS")
  private Cell<Account> account;
...
}

TOC

3. The ObjectGraphMapper

The ObjectGraphMapper API is the main entry point for managing entity instances, such as loading an entity (graph) from the database or saving it. You need to provide a GraphDatabaseService instance and Enum implementation types of Labels and RelationshipTypes to create an ObjectGraphMapper instance. The Labels and RelationshipTypes are part of your (graph) database schema whereas the GraphDatabaseService constitutes your database instance. The complete generic type definition of the ObjectGraphMapper is

ObjectGraphMapper<S extends Enum<S> & Label, T extends Enum<T> & RelationshipType>

The string representations of your enumerations must match the string literals used within your mapping definitions.

3.i Saving an entity (graph)

In principle, every mapped entity may serve as starting point for persisting an entity (graph) to the database. Initally, the ObjectGraphMapper will inspect the annotated id field to decide if there is a matching node within the database. If so, the matching node will be fetched for a merging operation or otherwise a new node will be created. In the latter case the required labels will be added to the just created node. In the event of a merging operation and if the entity has an annotated version field the ObjectGraphMapper will check the entity for staleness and will cancel the operation if necessary. Next, the mapped properties will be processed. Missing non-nullable properties will cause a failure. Subsequently, all outgoing links (SingleLink and Links) will be inspected. There are two possibilities: Either the corresponding fields are occupied by proxies or not. In the former case the given entity has been previously loaded from the database and its links has been preset with proxies. Again there are two possibilities. The load of the referenced entities has been triggered or not. In the former case every loaded entity must be recursively processed by the ObjectGraphMapper as it is the case if we have accessed the 'real' entities, e.g. an ArrayList of entities. A link preset with an unloaded proxy will be ignored. If a link must be processed and in the event of a merging operation all the corresponding relationships of the given node consistent with the link definition will be deleted at first, since we are assuming that those relationships will be refreshed by the given entity.

Simply call Node save(Object entity) on an ObjectGraphMapper instance to persist an entity (graph). Below are given some examples.

3.i.a Saving a single entity

GraphDatabaseService graphDatabaseService = ...
Account account = new Account("Tester");
account.setCountryCode("DE");
account.setLocalityName("Rodgau");
account.setStateName("Hessen");
ObjectGraphMapper<MyLabels, MyRelationships> objectGraphMapper = 
    new ObjectGraphMapper<>(graphDatabaseService, MyLabels.class, MyRelationships.class);
try (Transaction transaction = graphDatabaseService.beginTx()) {
  Node node = objectGraphMapper.save(account);
  transaction.success();
}

3.i.b Saving an entity graph

Note that only outgoing links will be (recursively) processed.

GraphDatabaseService graphDatabaseService = ...
LocalDateTime localDateTime = IsoChronology.INSTANCE.dateNow().atTime(LocalTime.now());
String formattedTime = localDateTime.format(DateTimeFormatter.ISO_LOCAL_DATE_TIME);
Account account = new Account("Tester");
account.setCountryCode("DE");
account.setLocalityName("Rodgau");
account.setStateName("Hessen");
KeyRing keyRing = new KeyRing(0L);
keyRing.setPath("." + File.separator + "store" + File.separator + "theKeystore.jks");
List<KeyItem> keyItems = new ArrayList<>();
KeyItem keyItem = new KeyItem(0L);
keyItem.setKeyRing(keyRing);
keyItem.setAlgorithm("AES/CBC/PKCS5Padding");
keyItem.setCreationDate(formattedTime);
keyItems.add(keyItem);
keyRing.setKeyItems(keyItems);
account.setKeyRing(keyRing);
account.setDocuments(new ArrayList<>());
Document document = new Document(0L);
document.setAccount(account);
document.setTitle("Testdocument-1");
document.setType("pdf");
document.setCreationDate(formattedTime);
account.getDocuments().add(document);
document = new Document(1L);
document.setAccount(account);
document.setTitle("Testdocument-2");
document.setType("pdf");
document.setCreationDate(formattedTime);
account.getDocuments().add(document);
ObjectGraphMapper<MyLabels, MyRelationships> objectGraphMapper = 
    new ObjectGraphMapper<>(graphDatabaseService, MyLabels.class, MyRelationships.class);
try (Transaction transaction = graphDatabaseService.beginTx()) {
  node = objectGraphMapper.save(account);
  transaction.success();
}

3.i.c SingleLink constraint violations

Basically, there are two ways to violate a SingleLink constraint. First, you fail to add a certain single link between two nodes (entities) but that link has been marked as non-nullable (which is the default). Or, you might try to add a second relationship (or rather link) between two nodes but that relationship type had been mapped as SingleLink. In the latter case, the ObjectGraphMapper implements a fail-fast behaviour, that is such errors will be detected during a save operation, see the subsequent example:

GraphDatabaseService graphDatabaseService = ...
Account superTester = new Account("Supertester");
superTester.setCountryCode("DE");
superTester.setLocalityName("Rodgau");
superTester.setStateName("Hessen");
KeyRing superTesterKeyRing = new KeyRing(0L);
superTesterKeyRing.setPath("." + File.separator + "store" + File.separator + "theSuperTesterKeystore.jks");
superTester.setKeyRing(superTesterKeyRing);
Account tester = new Account("Tester");
tester.setCountryCode("DE");
tester.setLocalityName("Hainhausen");
tester.setStateName("Hessen");
tester.setKeyRing(superTesterKeyRing);
ObjectGraphMapper<MyLabels, MyRelationships> objectGraphMapper = 
    new ObjectGraphMapper<>(graphDatabaseService, MyLabels.class, MyRelationships.class);
try (Transaction transaction = graphDatabaseService.beginTx()) {
  objectGraphMapper.save(superTester);
  objectGraphMapper.save(tester);
transaction.success();
}

In the example above, the same Keyring is added to different Account entities which is easy enough but that would result in two incoming OWNS links on the KeyRing node and that has been ruled out by the mapping definitions. This will raise an exception and as a consequence the transaction will be rolled back.

On the other hand non-nullable SingleLink violations won't be detected during a save operation at present but will raise an appropriate exception when trying to access an entity via a missing link after a load operation. This is due to the fact that these kind of errors can't be detected in the first run but will require a second pass. Unsatisfied links might occure deep in the recursion at any time but they might be resolved later on when revisiting nodes that have been saved already.

3.i.d Non-nullable properties

By default mapped properties are non-nullable. The ObjectGraphMapper enforces this by a fail-fast behaviour. Given the mapping definitions below

@NodeEntity(label = "ACCOUNTS")
public class Account {
  @Id @Property(name = "commonName") String userId;
  @Property String localityName;
  @Property String stateName;
  @Property String countryCode;
...
}

the subsequent example will raise an exception and therefore the transaction will be rolled back:

GraphDatabaseService graphDatabaseService = ...
Account account = new Account("Tester");
account.setCountryCode("DE");
account.setLocalityName("Rodgau");
ObjectGraphMapper<MyLabels, MyRelationships> objectGraphMapper = 
    new ObjectGraphMapper<>(graphDatabaseService, MyLabels.class, MyRelationships.class);
try (Transaction transaction = graphDatabaseService.beginTx()) {
  objectGraphMapper.save(account);
  transaction.success();
}

3.i.e Automatic IDs

The ObjectGraphMapper can provide automatically IDs for the appropriate annotated properties by relying on a background service. Obviously, without this service a missing ID would lead to a failure when saving entities. For every entity that participates in the service a corresponding database node will be managed. A certain property on this node will serve as high-water mark for IDs. During startup of the service the high-water mark on the corresponding nodes will be evaluated and the service will provide a buffer of IDs counting from the high-water mark. During shutdown of the service new high-water marks will be written on these nodes. The subsequent example uses this feature for Document and KeyRing entities:

GraphDatabaseService graphDatabaseService = ...
try {
  IdGeneratorService.getInstance().init(graphDatabaseService, Document.class.getName(), KeyRing.class.getName());
  IdGeneratorService.getInstance().start();
  Account account = new Account("Tester");
  account.setCountryCode("DE");
  account.setLocalityName("Rodgau");
  account.setStateName("Hessen");
  LocalDateTime localDateTime = IsoChronology.INSTANCE.dateNow().atTime(LocalTime.now());
  String formattedTime = localDateTime.format(DateTimeFormatter.ISO_LOCAL_DATE_TIME);
  final int TEST_DOCUMENTS = 10;
  List<Document> documents = new ArrayList<>();
  for (int i = 0; i < TEST_DOCUMENTS; i++) {
    Document document = new Document();
    document.setAccount(account);
    document.setTitle("Testdocument-" + i);
    document.setType("pdf");
    document.setCreationDate(formattedTime);
    documents.add(document);
  }
  account.setDocuments(documents);
  KeyRing keyRing = new KeyRing();
  keyRing.setAccount(account);
  keyRing.setPath("." + File.separator + "store" + File.separator + "theKeystore.jks");
  account.setKeyRing(keyRing);
  ObjectGraphMapper<MyLabels, MyRelationships> objectGraphMapper = 
      new ObjectGraphMapper<>(graphDatabaseService, MyLabels.class, MyRelationships.class);
  try (Transaction transaction = graphDatabaseService.beginTx()) {
    objectGraphMapper.save(account);
    transaction.success();
  }
}
finally {
  IdGeneratorService.getInstance().shutDown();
}

3.i.f Optimistic locking

Suppose that a certain entity will be loaded twice by different users at the same time. Now, the first user updates the entity and saves it back to the database. After the transaction completes the second user is left with an outdated entity object. If he decides to save back his old copy of the entity he may overwrite the changes done by the first user. If the application logic allows such concurrent accesses some locking on the affected objects must be applied. Optimistic locking is favourable in scenarios with low data contention. Read access is generally granted but the saving of an outdated object will raise a failure. Use the Version annotation on an Integer field to enable optimistic locking on an entity object, see the mapping definition below:

@NodeEntity(label = "ENCRYPTED_DOCUMENTS")
public class EncryptedDocument extends Document {
  @Property @Version private Integer counter = 0;
  public EncryptedDocument(Long id) {
    super(id);
  }
}

Now the subsequently shown code will raise an exception and the second transaction will fail, since the entity graph references an outdated object now:

GraphDatabaseService graphDatabaseService = ...
LocalDateTime localDateTime = IsoChronology.INSTANCE.dateNow().atTime(LocalTime.now());
String formattedTime = localDateTime.format(DateTimeFormatter.ISO_LOCAL_DATE_TIME);
Account account = new Account("Supertester");
account.setCountryCode("DE");
account.setLocalityName("Rodgau");
account.setStateName("Hessen");
account.setDocuments(new ArrayList<>());
PlaintextDocument document = new PlaintextDocument(0L);
document.setAccount(account);
document.setTitle("Testdocument-1");
document.setType("pdf");
document.setCreationDate(formattedTime);
account.getDocuments().add(document);
ObjectGraphMapper<MyLabels, MyRelationships> objectGraphMapper = 
    new ObjectGraphMapper<>(graphDatabaseService, MyLabels.class, MyRelationships.class);
try (Transaction transaction = graphDatabaseService.beginTx()) {
  objectGraphMapper.save(account);
  transaction.success();
}
try (Transaction transaction = graphDatabaseService.beginTx()) {
  objectGraphMapper.save(account);
  transaction.success();
}

3.ii Database roundtrips (loading and saving)

You need to provide the class and the ID of the desired entity to load the corresponding object. All fields which represent links (SingleLink and Links, outgoing as well as incoming) will be preset with proxies. As soon as you traverse these proxies, e.g. by invoking Collection.size(), the load of the corresponding objects will be triggered. Call <U> U load(Class<U> entityClass, Object id) on an ObjectGraphMapper instance to load a certain entity of type U, see the subsequent code excerpts. First, we will save an entity graph into the database:

GraphDatabaseService graphDatabaseService = ...
Account account = new Account("Tester");
account.setCountryCode("DE");
account.setLocalityName("Rodgau");
account.setStateName("Hessen");
LocalDateTime localDateTime = IsoChronology.INSTANCE.dateNow().atTime(LocalTime.now());
String formattedTime = localDateTime.format(DateTimeFormatter.ISO_LOCAL_DATE_TIME);
final int TEST_DOCUMENTS = 5;
account.setDocuments(new ArrayList<>());
for (long i = 0; i < TEST_DOCUMENTS; i++) {
  Document document = new Document(i);
  document.setAccount(account);
  document.setTitle("Testdocument-" + i);
  document.setType("pdf");
  document.setCreationDate(formattedTime);
  account.getDocuments().add(document);
}
final Long KEYRING_ID = 31L;
account.setKeyRing(new KeyRing(KEYRING_ID));
account.getKeyRing().setPath("dummy");
account.getKeyRing().setAccount(account);
ObjectGraphMapper<MyLabels, MyRelationships> objectGraphMapper = 
    new ObjectGraphMapper<>(graphDatabaseService, MyLabels.class, MyRelationships.class);
try (Transaction transaction = graphDatabaseService.beginTx()) {
  objectGraphMapper.save(account);
  transaction.success();
}

Next, we will load the Document(id=3) entity, change its title and save it back again, everything in one transaction:

final Long DOCUMENT_ID = 3L;
try (Transaction transaction = graphDatabaseService.beginTx()) {
  Document document;
  document = objectGraphMapper.load(Document.class, DOCUMENT_ID);
  assert Objects.equals(DOCUMENT_ID, document.getId());
  assert Objects.equals(document.getTitle(), "Testdocument-" + DOCUMENT_ID);
  assert Objects.equals(document.getAccount().getUserId(), "Tester");
  document.setTitle("Changed title.");
  objectGraphMapper.save(document);
  transaction.success();
}

Finally, we will verify, that the state is persistent within the database:

try (Transaction transaction = graphDatabaseService.beginTx()) {
  Node accountNode = graphDatabaseService.findNode(MyLabels.ACCOUNTS, "commonName", "Tester");
  assert accountNode != null;
  assert accountNode.getDegree(MyRelationships.HAS, Direction.OUTGOING) == TEST_DOCUMENTS;
  assert accountNode.getDegree(MyRelationships.OWNS, Direction.OUTGOING) == 1;
  Node documentNode = graphDatabaseService.findNode(MyLabels.DOCUMENTS, "id", DOCUMENT_ID);
  assert documentNode != null;
  assert Objects.equals(documentNode.getProperty("title"), "Changed title.");
  assert documentNode.getDegree(MyRelationships.HAS, Direction.INCOMING) == 1;
  transaction.success();
}

3.ii.a Some limitations and pitfalls

As the code excerpts above demonstrate, it is possible to load a certain Document and access its parent Account by traversing the incoming SingleLink. But doing so is a bad idea if you want to modify both the Account and one of its Documents. First, you can't use the Document entity as starting point for a save operation since only outgoing links will be processed. That is the following code doesn't work:

final Long DOCUMENT_ID = 3L;
try (Transaction transaction = graphDatabaseService.beginTx()) {
  Document document;
  document = objectGraphMapper.load(Document.class, DOCUMENT_ID);
  assert Objects.equals(DOCUMENT_ID, document.getId());
  assert Objects.equals(document.getTitle(), "Testdocument-" + DOCUMENT_ID);
  assert Objects.equals(document.getAccount().getUserId(), "Tester");
  document.setTitle("Changed title.");
  document.getAccount().setCountryCode("EN"); // doesn't work
  objectGraphMapper.save(document);
  transaction.success();
}

Now you might try to use the Account as starting point:

final Long DOCUMENT_ID = 3L;
try (Transaction transaction = graphDatabaseService.beginTx()) {
  Document document;
  document = objectGraphMapper.load(Document.class, DOCUMENT_ID);
  assert Objects.equals(DOCUMENT_ID, document.getId());
  assert Objects.equals(document.getTitle(), "Testdocument-" + DOCUMENT_ID);
  assert Objects.equals(document.getAccount().getUserId(), "Tester");
  document.setTitle("Changed title."); // doesn't work
  document.getAccount().setCountryCode("EN");
  objectGraphMapper.save(document.getAccount());
  transaction.success();
}

But this doesn't work either. Now the modification on the Document entity has been lost. The reason for this is that the Account has proxied its Document collection when it has been loaded. It doesn't see the modified Document object. If we tried to traverse to its Document collection a new fresh copy of Document entities would be loaded including an unmodified Document(id=3).

The actual reason for these failures is that we have a parent-detail relationship between Account and Document. If we want to modify both the Account and its Documents we must start with the Account from the beginning:

final String USER_ID = "Tester";
try (Transaction transaction = graphDatabaseService.beginTx()) {
  Account tester = objectGraphMapper.load(Account.class, USER_ID);
  assert Objects.equals(USER_ID, tester.getUserId());
  tester.setCountryCode("EN");
  tester.getDocuments().forEach(document -> document.setTitle("Changed-" + document.getId()));
  objectGraphMapper.save(tester);
  transaction.success();
}

TOC

(To be continued.)

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

README.md

README.md

neo4jtools (work in progress)

Table of Contents

1. Build

2. Modelling entities with annotations

2.i Mapping the identity

2.ii Mapping properties

2.iii Mapping relationships

2.iii.a one-to-many

2.iii.b many-to-many

2.iii.c one-to-one

3. The ObjectGraphMapper

3.i Saving an entity (graph)

3.i.a Saving a single entity

3.i.b Saving an entity graph

3.i.c SingleLink constraint violations

3.i.d Non-nullable properties

3.i.e Automatic IDs

3.i.f Optimistic locking

3.ii Database roundtrips (loading and saving)

3.ii.a Some limitations and pitfalls

Files

README.md

Latest commit

History

README.md

File metadata and controls

neo4jtools (work in progress)

Table of Contents

1. Build

2. Modelling entities with annotations

2.i Mapping the identity

2.ii Mapping properties

2.iii Mapping relationships

2.iii.a one-to-many

2.iii.b many-to-many

2.iii.c one-to-one

3. The ObjectGraphMapper

3.i Saving an entity (graph)

3.i.a Saving a single entity

3.i.b Saving an entity graph

3.i.c SingleLink constraint violations

3.i.d Non-nullable properties

3.i.e Automatic IDs

3.i.f Optimistic locking

3.ii Database roundtrips (loading and saving)

3.ii.a Some limitations and pitfalls