We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In a map, the following cases are visualized in the same way.
(A)
a <- b -> b
(B)
a >< b
That's unfortunate, because (A) espresses that a and b are contrary, not more, and (B) expresses that they are contradictory.
Suggestion: Red arrow with arrows at both ends for contradictory.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For example, in dot, this could be the visualization of a contradicory relation:
n1 -> n0 [color="red", type="map-edge", dir="both", arrowhead="diamond", arrowtail="diamond"];
And this could be the visualization of a contrary relation:
n1 -> n0 [color="red", type="map-edge", dir="both"];
Sorry, something went wrong.
Currently dagre-d3 does not support arrow heads at both ends, but there is a pull request ready to be merged:
dagrejs/dagre-d3#316
Let's hope it gets merged soon. Until then, contrary and contradictory relations will only be one-headed in the Dagre-D3 map.
This has still not been merged into Dagre and has changed to dagrejs/dagre-d3/pull/361
No branches or pull requests
In a map, the following cases are visualized in the same way.
(A)
(B)
That's unfortunate, because (A) espresses that a and b are contrary, not more, and (B) expresses that they are contradictory.
Suggestion: Red arrow with arrows at both ends for contradictory.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: