Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

If np.shape(neighbors)[0] is taken instead of np.shape(neighbors)[1] (as it should be), the resultant index has always a low value (hardly never a positive one) ... even when evaluating good clustering results as the one obtained running hdbscan with the noisy moons dataset (provided by the author). #26

Open
pancodia opened this issue Jul 5, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@pancodia
Copy link

pancodia commented Jul 5, 2023

          If `np.shape(neighbors)[0]` is taken instead of `np.shape(neighbors)[1]` (as it should be), the resultant index has always a low value (hardly never a positive one) ... even when evaluating good clustering results as the one obtained running hdbscan with the noisy moons dataset (provided by the author). 

Does anyone know why?

Originally posted by @onofricamila in #10 (comment)

I also got negative dbcv score for a good clustering from hdbscan. Is this expected?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant