-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Economic impact (Flood) #52
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Comments
Instead of one just one column / layer
Once the view.3155 has been updated, @therter can create the respective @mapview:ogc:wms service paths in resource Pluvial Flood risk/impact screening and enable the columns in the Risk & Impact Table. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
ok, I ask @humerh also to double check if the classification and style of the layer "flood damage class" is correct with respect to what indicated by @stefanon and me. I see almost everything red on that layer, while the damage in euro is much more diversified and more in line with the results I would expect in terms of impact.
I really don't understand the meaning of the "flood damage class" layer, as said in the risk/impact assessment for flood we should only have damage in euro (possibly split in the three subcategories of roads, residential and non-residential buildings).
Originally posted by @mattia-leone in clarity-h2020/csis#154 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: