-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 138
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Absent state with quadlet should remove quadlet file as well as podman resource. #739
Comments
Yeah, it sounds reasonable. We can check |
We can delete |
So in the case of a container deletion, I think we will perform the following steps:
|
/kind feature
Description
When the state is set to be absent, and quadlet options are set, the expected behavior would be to both remove the quadlet file and podman resource. The current behavior is so just remove the podman resource (image, container, volume, ...).
As a user this would be desirable for me to manage podman deployments purely through this module rather than relying on using the file module to remove the quadlets this module generates. Currently I am achieving this behavior through the use of a role, but think this would be better implemented by the module itself.
I am reasonably new to using Ansible so let me know if there are any issues with this approach or if it would not indeed be expected behavior in the ecosystem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: