We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
标题开玩笑的。谁有兴趣来写这篇文章?基于简单线性回归和散点图的重大科学发现(假说):
https://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/redshift.html
不用太长。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@Perfectizer 林主席有没有兴趣试试?
Sorry, something went wrong.
才看见。。。T_T我试试看
@Perfectizer 林主席 突然看到这个帖子……我来挖坟了 话说这个是啥情况了 还是说你要写点别的哈哈哈
认领啦~
接下来计划把这个作为引入问题,写一个短文,然后号召大家分享自己知道的回归重要应用,微信和论坛同步
最新情况:有点卡文,因为不知道怎么把这个历史资料落到观点输出。
通过相关文献的阅读发现,哈勃实际上并不是原创,这种线性关系在他之前应该有,而造父变星测距也并不是他的首发,但是两者结合就给出了高质量的数据支持。感觉这个有点像数据科学家的模式,拿来前沿的领域知识,然后用最朴素的方法把问题搞定
XueningZhu
LingrenKong
No branches or pull requests
标题开玩笑的。谁有兴趣来写这篇文章?基于简单线性回归和散点图的重大科学发现(假说):
https://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/redshift.html
不用太长。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: