diff --git a/_posts/2023-07-24-core-web-vitals-for-search-engine-optimisation.md b/_posts/2023-07-24-core-web-vitals-for-search-engine-optimisation.md
index bc3912f0..3469c12a 100644
--- a/_posts/2023-07-24-core-web-vitals-for-search-engine-optimisation.md
+++ b/_posts/2023-07-24-core-web-vitals-for-search-engine-optimisation.md
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ manner and I’m happy that the Core Web Vitals team constantly evolve or even
replace the metrics in response to changes in the landscape.
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ The simplified Page Experience report contains:
* No Intrusive Interstitials
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ Incidentally, although INP isn’t yet a Core Web Vital, Search Console has
started sending emails warning site owners about INP issues:
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ they live in (or something else entirely)?
It’s done on a per-URL basis:
@@ -465,14 +465,14 @@ Nowadays, the same data and layout exists, but with much less deliberate
wording. Field data is still presented first:
And lab data, from the Lighthouse test we just initiated, beneath that:
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ If a URL achieves _Good_ status, that status will be used as a ranking signal in
search results.
@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ any searches for you on desktop will have your fast site taken into
consideration.