diff --git a/_posts/2023-07-24-core-web-vitals-for-search-engine-optimisation.md b/_posts/2023-07-24-core-web-vitals-for-search-engine-optimisation.md index bc3912f0..3469c12a 100644 --- a/_posts/2023-07-24-core-web-vitals-for-search-engine-optimisation.md +++ b/_posts/2023-07-24-core-web-vitals-for-search-engine-optimisation.md @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ manner and I’m happy that the Core Web Vitals team constantly evolve or even replace the metrics in response to changes in the landscape.
- + Graphic showing the three current Core Web Vitals and their thresholds
Web Vitals
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ The simplified Page Experience report contains: * No Intrusive Interstitials
- + Graphic showing how the Page Experience report actually contains Core Web Vitals as a subset of requirements
Simplifying the Page Experience report
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ Incidentally, although INP isn’t yet a Core Web Vital, Search Console has started sending emails warning site owners about INP issues:
- + Screenshot showing an example email that Search Console has begun sending site owners to warn them about INP issues
Search Console emails have begun warning people about INP issues. Credit: Ryan Townsend.
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ they live in (or something else entirely)? It’s done on a per-URL basis:
- + Screenshot of a table showing that Core Web Vitals are judged at URL-level in Search
Page Experience report
@@ -465,14 +465,14 @@ Nowadays, the same data and layout exists, but with much less deliberate wording. Field data is still presented first:
- + A recent PageSpeed Insights screenshot showing less clear wording around field data
Here we can see that this data came from CrUX and is based on real, aggregated data.
And lab data, from the Lighthouse test we just initiated, beneath that:
- + A recent PageSpeed Insights screenshot showing less clear wording around lab data
Here we can clearly see that this was run from a predetermined location, on a predetermined device, over a predetermined connection speed. This was one page load run by us, for us.
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ If a URL achieves _Good_ status, that status will be used as a ranking signal in search results.
- +Screenshot showing that URLs will be marked up in Search if they pass all Page Experience signals, but not showing that they would get marked down for not passing
Page Experience report
@@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ any searches for you on desktop will have your fast site taken into consideration.
- +A screenshot of Treo showing Core Web Vitals data from CrUX segmented by country, displayed on a world map
Treo makes it easy to visualise global CrUX data.