Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Appveyor tests fail on ENV['PATH'] being empty #579

Closed
olleolleolle opened this issue Dec 29, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

Appveyor tests fail on ENV['PATH'] being empty #579

olleolleolle opened this issue Dec 29, 2018 · 6 comments

Comments

@olleolleolle
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Looking at Appveyor tests failing, I noted that some of them were about ENV['PATH'] was blank.

Can that be configured to fix it?

Expected Behavior

No tests failing on Appveyor, would be nice.

Current Behavior

Tests fail with ENV['PATH'] not being set on Appveyor.

Possible Solution

Configuring Appveyor builds to have a $PATH.

Steps to Reproduce (for bugs)

n/a

Context & Motivation

It keeps the build indicator red for all our PRs.

@luke-hill
Copy link
Contributor

Update note for Developers. This currently (As of May 2019), accounts for ~30% of failures. 7/23 in a recent appveyor run

@mvz
Copy link
Contributor

mvz commented May 13, 2019

Two questions I have:

I can have a look at #505 next weekend and will also update the build set then; the bulk of the rest of the failures are due to unsupported Ruby versions I think.

@luke-hill
Copy link
Contributor

luke-hill commented May 13, 2019

Given #505 has had 3 of you essentially mobbing on it. I suggest you get that merged in (If it's possible, as it's grown enormously), and then we re-check failures.

EDIT: The 23 failures were for a variety of reasons, but not for unsupported rubies. There was some related to newlines, some looked like legit errors and some were because of PATH. Honestly I think we need to merge in all of these WIP branches and then take another look. I highly doubt we've fixed the issues though

@mvz mvz removed the slow burner label May 18, 2019
@mvz
Copy link
Contributor

mvz commented May 18, 2019

@luke-hill I've rebased #505 so we can get a fresh build and perhaps play around a bit with merging only part if that makes more sense. We'll see where this goes.

@mvz
Copy link
Contributor

mvz commented May 20, 2019

Closing this as we now have appveyor tests succeeding 🎉.

@mvz mvz closed this as completed May 20, 2019
@olleolleolle
Copy link
Contributor Author

So many congratulations!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants