Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

listsinceblock #34

Open
mister-game opened this issue Nov 24, 2019 · 8 comments
Open

listsinceblock #34

mister-game opened this issue Nov 24, 2019 · 8 comments

Comments

@mister-game
Copy link

listsinceblock, debug console, causes crash

@akshaynexus
Copy link
Contributor

please describe a way to reproduce the crash

@mister-game
Copy link
Author

mister-game commented Nov 25, 2019 via email

@AzrielJale
Copy link
Contributor

thats not full command
listsinceblock ( "blockhash" target-confirmations includeWatchonly)
i assume you have to give it target blockhash. or it goes haywire.

but still, shouldnt crash the wallet.

@mister-game
Copy link
Author

mister-game commented Dec 3, 2019 via email

@AzrielJale
Copy link
Contributor

yeah, it seems to just drop the wallet.
also happens on 5.1.1

@mister-game
Copy link
Author

mister-game commented Dec 4, 2019 via email

@Liquid369
Copy link
Member

listsinceblock itself is actually able to accept an empty parameter and should list a greater range
WITHOUT a parameter in listsinceblock would start from block 0 until now and listing the entirety of transactions since the start of the chain.
Maybe itself that should be limited to ONLY a block hash as for how far we are into the chain now that is too much data to process causing the crash.

Is using it WITH a blockhash causing a crash still?

@mister-game
Copy link
Author

listsincelastblock, worked ok with a recent hash.
This is not important to me. I have never used this command and cannot think of an instance where I would. Maybe force it to take parameter?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants