-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fold IND(frozenObj, CNS) #85127
Merged
Merged
Fold IND(frozenObj, CNS) #85127
Changes from 11 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
160fedd
Introduce readObject
EgorBo b266af4
Address feedback
EgorBo bd905ca
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:dotnet/runtime into readObj
EgorBo a61f0ac
Add a test for NAOT
EgorBo ad877e3
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:dotnet/runtime into readObj
EgorBo 74d0d17
Update src/coreclr/tools/aot/ILCompiler.RyuJit/JitInterface/CorInfoIm…
EgorBo 46582e2
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:dotnet/runtime into readObj
EgorBo 02c30b8
Address feedback
EgorBo 0da2398
remove assert
EgorBo d969475
Address feedback
EgorBo a3b2b06
missing rename
EgorBo 11d801e
Rename getObjectType -> getObjectContent; getReadonlyStaticFieldValue…
EgorBo 1b6a8d9
make formatter happy
EgorBo 099139c
Merge branch 'main' of github.com:dotnet/runtime into readObj
EgorBo 1ae3ded
Merge branch 'main' into readObj
EgorBo File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: Both methods return the same thing, but one calls it Value and the other calls Data. Can we use the same name for the thing that the method returns?
Some ideas:
readStaticField
+readObject
readStaticFieldData
+readObjectData
getStaticFieldContent
+getObjectContent
(
getReadonlyStaticFieldValue
method does not seem to be strictly limited to readonly static fields, so the name can be relaxed).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Decided to go with:
Put a condition to
getObjectContent
to give up on types with GC pointers - want to have a real use case to test properly if you don't mind.