We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Here are two examples where the supposedly missing entry is listed with an invalid DOI:
https://orcid-scraper.toolforge.org/results?qid=Q4241213&orcid=0000-0002-8255-6349 lists the invalid https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-14 (while https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-14-43 would be correct)
https://orcid-scraper.toolforge.org/results?qid=Q87656538&orcid=0000-0002-9497-4329 lists the invalid https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1947rspb20201947 (while https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1947 would be correct)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The validator package could be used for that.
Sorry, something went wrong.
The wrong DOI is also present in ORCID
Related paper on the general issue with DOI errors: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-022-04367-w
It could be validated using this library: https://github.com/papis/python-doi https://python-doi.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api.html
No branches or pull requests
Here are two examples where the supposedly missing entry is listed with an invalid DOI:
https://orcid-scraper.toolforge.org/results?qid=Q4241213&orcid=0000-0002-8255-6349 lists the invalid https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-14 (while https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-14-43 would be correct)
https://orcid-scraper.toolforge.org/results?qid=Q87656538&orcid=0000-0002-9497-4329 lists the invalid https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1947rspb20201947 (while https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1947 would be correct)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: