From 670884fdfe795b672b0404b5d6db65cf1f1bc843 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vince Knight Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 12:55:34 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add quotation marks to comments. --- _posts/2024-11-01-review-of-probability.md | 16 ++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/_posts/2024-11-01-review-of-probability.md b/_posts/2024-11-01-review-of-probability.md index bd430b7..8b0d280 100644 --- a/_posts/2024-11-01-review-of-probability.md +++ b/_posts/2024-11-01-review-of-probability.md @@ -12,20 +12,20 @@ You can see a recording of the class [here](https://cardiff.cloud.panopto.eu/Pan Before the quiz, I asked you how you felt things were going. A number of students mentioned that there was a bit of a step up in complexity this week. -> I struggled a bit with the probability coding. -> I understand the code when it is written but trying to write it myself is a challenge +> "I struggled a bit with the probability coding. +> I understand the code when it is written but trying to write it myself is a challenge" -> probability is difficult. tricky to do it intuitively. the container part in -> the loop is confusing +> "probability is difficult. tricky to do it intuitively. the container part in +> the loop is confusing" -> i know what probability code we are meant to write but i have no clue what it -> does and how to use it +> "i know what probability code we are meant to write but i have no clue what it +> does and how to use it" -> Still a bit confused about the actual python language and the logic behind some of it +> "Still a bit confused about the actual python language and the logic behind some of it" This step is somewhat normal. As one comment said: -> Felt like we were doing actual coding this week +> "Felt like we were doing actual coding this week" This is mainly because we are writing code to represent the scenarios (selecting a token and based on the result flipping a specific probability coin