-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggestion: check if a node is connected to an indirect specific node (e.g., high_value_target) #18
Comments
Hi @A-acuto, Thank you for raising this suggestion. This has been added to the backlog of our internal issue tracker (Jira issue AIDT-123) as a community feature request. I will provide an update once we've had a chance to look into this. Thanks again for your contributions to Yawning-Titan! |
Hi @A-acuto. This has been reviewed and a ticket has been created on our product backlog. |
…testing-of-jupyter-notebooks AIDT-112 - Enable testing of Jupyter Notebooks
…testing-of-jupyter-notebooks AIDT-112 - Enable testing of Jupyter Notebooks
Thank you for raising this. This has been added to our internal backlog (reference 1222) and will be reviewed by one of the dev team soon. |
Hello,
In complex networks, it would be useful to know if a node is connected to another one in an indirect way.
The getter functions from network_interface, get_base_connected_nodes and get_current_connected_nodes, returns only (as far as I have understood) the nodes directly (edge =1) connected to an input node.
Instead the networkx function node_connectivity(input_graph, node_to_check, specific_node) returns all the possible paths that connects the node_to_check to a target_node (0 if there are none, 1/2/N depending on how many paths are present).
In this way it can be possible to check and count how many nodes are affected in case of the isolation of a gateway node to preserve a high_value_target or similar decisions.
Hope this helps,
Cheers,
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: