rb_to_p_superiority() #553
Unanswered
SandraJGeiger
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
Hi Sandara, I'm not sure which effect size you're using from X <- c(1,2,3,3,3,3,4,4,4,4,4,5,5,5,5)
effectsize::rank_biserial(X, mu = 3)
#> r (rank biserial) | 95% CI
#> --------------------------------
#> 0.62 | [0.06, 0.88]
#>
#> - Deviation from a difference of 3.
effectsize::p_superiority(X, mu = 3, parametric = FALSE)
#> Pr(superiority) | 95% CI
#> ------------------------------
#> 0.81 | [0.53, 0.94]
#>
#> - Non-parametric CLES
effectsize::rb_to_p_superiority(0.62)
#> [1] 0.81 Created on 2023-01-18 with reprex v2.0.2 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Dear all,
I calculated one-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and obtained the rank biserial correlation using the rcompanion::wilcoxon.test() function. This function takes ranks and signs into account when calculating the rb correlation.
Now, for an easier interpretation, I would like to transform the rb correlation with the "rb_to_p_superiority()" function. I was wondering whether this function is only valid for rb correlations that only take the sign into account (x participants below 0 and y participants above 0) or also for rb correlations that weigh the sign and ranks as in the rcompanion package?
I hope I explained my question sufficiently.
Many thanks in advance.
Sandra
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions