ICC for mixed-effects location scale models #520
Unanswered
simoncolumbus
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I am wondering how
performance::icc()
computes ICCs for mixed-effects location scale models (MELSMs) inbrms
. Using the function on a MELSM yields adjusted and conditional ICCs, but I could not find any documentation for this.I am not too familiar with ICCs for MELSMs, but know that Hedeker et al. (2012) propose an ICC for MELSM,
where$\alpha_0$ is the BS variance of the intercept, $t_0$ is the WS variance, and $\sigma_\omega^2$ is the BS variance of the scale. The results from
icc()
are quite far from that.I am also not sure why the adjusted and conditional effects differ, given that the model (see MWE below) does not include fixed effects.
Reference
Hedeker, D., Mermelstein, R. J., & Demirtas, H. (2012). Modeling between‐subject and within‐subject variances in ecological momentary assessment data using mixed‐effects location scale models. Statistics in medicine, 31(27), 3328-3336.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions