Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document that we don't implement the DataSpecification template class #112

Closed
jkhsjdhjs opened this issue Aug 22, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed
Labels
BlockingRelease This issue needs to be solved before the pending release v3.0

Comments

@jkhsjdhjs
Copy link
Contributor

See https://industrialdigitaltwin.org/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/06/IDTA-01001-3-0_SpecificationAssetAdministrationShell_Part1_Metamodel.pdf#page=107

Where would be the best place to document this?

@jkhsjdhjs jkhsjdhjs mentioned this issue Aug 24, 2023
26 tasks
@s-heppner
Copy link
Contributor

I think we should do that

  • in the README
  • at HasDataSpecification

@s-heppner s-heppner added v3.0 BlockingRelease This issue needs to be solved before the pending release labels Oct 19, 2023
@s-heppner
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed in #156

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
BlockingRelease This issue needs to be solved before the pending release v3.0
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants