Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PeerDAS Breakout Room #3 #1093

Closed
hwwhww opened this issue Jul 4, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

PeerDAS Breakout Room #3 #1093

hwwhww opened this issue Jul 4, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@hwwhww
Copy link
Collaborator

hwwhww commented Jul 4, 2024

Agenda

@ppopth
Copy link
Member

ppopth commented Jul 8, 2024

I would like to propose the following spec change

@ralexstokes
Copy link
Member

I won't be able to make it but would like to confirm consensus and/or get a temperature check on:

  1. preference to have CL drive blob limits, but NOT handle gas/fee computations (context: EIP-7742: Uncouple blob limits per block across CL and EL consensus-specs#3800 vs Blobgas computation in CL consensus-specs#3813)
  2. do we realistically see ourselves changing the blob target to anything other than MAX // 2? if we do, then we should also have the CL send target along with max values (with the resulting extension of the EL header to have both values)

@hwwhww hwwhww closed this as completed Jul 18, 2024
@jimmygchen
Copy link

Issue for next breakout #1103.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants