Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Execution Layer Meeting 170 #857

Closed
timbeiko opened this issue Aug 31, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Execution Layer Meeting 170 #857

timbeiko opened this issue Aug 31, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator

timbeiko commented Aug 31, 2023

Meeting Info

Agenda

@hwwhww
Copy link
Collaborator

hwwhww commented Sep 12, 2023

[add link]: For the churn limit discussion, ethereum/consensus-specs#3499 proposal may replace ethereum/consensus-specs#3448

@gakonst
Copy link

gakonst commented Sep 12, 2023

Hi! Per @timbeiko encouragement...would love to spend 5-10m to present some reth-related slides, how we intend to interface with ACD etc, as well as leave some time for Q&A!

@yperbasis
Copy link
Member

yperbasis commented Sep 13, 2023

I'd like to discuss a couple of questions:

  • Is Update EIP-4788: post audit tweaks EIPs#7672 included in devnet9?
  • Should system address 0xff..fe be removed after an EIP-4788 system call if it was previously existing but empty? There are quite a few scenarios in execution-spec-tests that have that. Right now it is not in geth (and in erigon) because SubBalance, unlike AddBalance, doesn't touch the address when the transferred value is 0.

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Added @yperbasis

@timbeiko
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Closed in favor of #867

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants