-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Notes on possible functionality improvements to autogen #128
Comments
What will happen to this after the first generator run? The liquid code will be replaced by normal code, right? So the code has no special meaning to autogen system, and subsequent generator runs won't be able to update the code? |
That's my "slightly different syntax" note 😉 I'm still thinking about it -- do you have any ideas there? My hope was that it would be autocompleted and syntax highlighted by an IDE normally, so it couldn't just be in a comment... hmmmm 😕 |
I have no ideas. I don't see how we can make same code to be accepted both by compiler/interpreter and autogen unless its in a comment. |
Here's a quick list of features I think it might be worth adding (for a TODO list / general discussion if needed):
Ability to mark sections of code to be templated inline for sections that aren't worth a new template file. This would allow you to do something like this (although probably with slightly different syntax):The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: