Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ship plugin disk space fix in upstream jenkins image #232

Open
hrishin opened this issue Jan 21, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Ship plugin disk space fix in upstream jenkins image #232

hrishin opened this issue Jan 21, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@hrishin
Copy link
Member

hrishin commented Jan 21, 2019

In order to reduce the plugins disk usage, we have symlinked plugins directory.
To switch upstream Jenkins OpenShift base (builder) image, we need to ship the plugins fix in the upstream image as well.

@chmouel
Copy link

chmouel commented Jan 21, 2019

👍 and i think we need to have an issue in upstream openshift/jenkins repository,

@piyush-garg
Copy link

piyush-garg commented Feb 13, 2019

Basically, we have added two fixes -

  1. Symlink plugins instead of copying them fabric8-jenkins/jenkins-openshift-base#49
  2. Improves plugin storage fix and reduces the image size fabric8-jenkins/jenkins-openshift-base#52

in our fork to fix the issues -

  1. Optimise plugin disk space in Jenkins openshiftio/openshift.io#4568
  2. Build: reduce the jenkins image size openshiftio/openshift.io#4635

We need to add these two fixes in upstream so that we can continue our efforts of moving to upstream images.

For this, we need to create an issue there, discuss with upstream folks how we can get it added there. Maybe we can add a flag, which if set, symlink the plugins in place of copying

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants