Found disagreement in the SM binned differential BR of B2KTauTau with the paper #227
Unanswered
rajeevneutrino
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hi @rajeevneutrino, the disagreement that you find might be due to different definitions of what "binned branching ratio" means. Note that |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Dear authors,
The SM value obtained for the "Binned differential branching ratio of B±→K± τ+ τ−" in q2=[15,22] from flavio is 1.79e-8. I wonder why this value doesn't match with the value reported in arXiv:1712.01919v1 which is 1.20e-7. In fact, from my own code I get similar value as reported in the paper.
I find similar disagreements for B2K*tautau (q2=15,19), Bs2Phitautau (q2=15,18.8) decays. However, the BR(Bs2tautau) is perfectly fine.
Kindly help me
Thanks and Regards
![Screenshot from 2023-05-19 16-42-03](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/71543739/239517152-1f104802-bb55-4cc8-9f7b-f862e3b1ba85.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.0y_k_dkc5cAfE7lDr4OZkuOev6ccQloIiyG-kSCGvlM)
Rajeev
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions