Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request: Allow for chat back-and-forth. #20

Open
Klokinator opened this issue Jan 6, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Request: Allow for chat back-and-forth. #20

Klokinator opened this issue Jan 6, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Klokinator
Copy link

Klokinator commented Jan 6, 2023

This extension is fantastic! I've been really enjoying using it. However, it has one practical limitation, which is that you cannot do a back-and-forth with the AI by following up to previous messages. This means if I ask it to give me a recipe, I can't then ask for it to fine-tune that recipe or swap out ingredients. I have to regenerate the entire recipe, and it might come out entirely different.

Any chance you can add a follow-up system for it? The fact this extension uses Da-Vinci makes it really stand out from the crowd!

Also, do you have some way people can support you financially? I'd be more than willing to drop $25 if it meant getting a feature like this in.

@jcote123
Copy link

jcote123 commented Jan 7, 2023

This would be amazing! Being able to ask follow up questions would be a game changer for an already game changing extension.

@siddsax
Copy link
Contributor

siddsax commented Jan 9, 2023

Thanks @Klokinator and @jcote123 for the same! We have thought about the chat interface, though have not yet cracked how that fits in the UX as a command bar. We'll for sure look into the same more closely.

@siddsax siddsax added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 9, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants