Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WC task bert accuracy is much lower than paper claimed #2

Open
JizeCao opened this issue Jan 3, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

WC task bert accuracy is much lower than paper claimed #2

JizeCao opened this issue Jan 3, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@JizeCao
Copy link

JizeCao commented Jan 3, 2020

I have tried use the SentEval WC dataset to evaluate Bert performance. But the result is much lower than the paper claimed. (0.4 compares to 24.9 in paper for layer 0). I achieve similar performance on all other 9 tasks.

@JizeCao
Copy link
Author

JizeCao commented Feb 3, 2020

It's about one month and still no one reply ... The issue is relatively critical because I have tried different language models with current codebase and none of them has a reasonable result on this one. Is there any reason behind that? I am very grateful if someone can reply me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant