Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IsIntersectionOfCongruenceSubgroups should be a category or representation, not a property #7

Open
fingolfin opened this issue May 15, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@fingolfin
Copy link
Member

Right now, IsIntersectionOfCongruenceSubgroups is implemented as a GAP property. But to me, it looks as if this isn't a mathematical property at all, but rather one of internal representation. Both the description of this property, as well as the fact that there are no methods for it, suggest that to me.

In that case, it should probably not be a property at all, but rather a category or representation.

I am actually wondering the same about IsCongruenceSubgroupGammaUpper0 and all the others, but there at least in principle one could imagine that somebody might implement a real method for these to test whether a given group has this property...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants