-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Query RNA (cytidine(32)/uridine(32)-2'-O)-methyltransferase #28550
Comments
Yes, I agree. |
@sjm41 Is the following a correct summary? If so, I can implement.
|
@raymond91125 I think that is correct, but I think we should wait for @pgaudet to confirm when she's back next week. I realise that one potential issue with this change is what should be annotated if/when "(cytidine(32)-2'-O)-methyltransferase activity" is shown - would the curator then annotate with both the new GO terms? We should look at current annotations (and their sources) to GO:0106339 and GO:0106340 to check on this. |
This looks OK to me. I checked the annotation for both existing terms, GO:0106339 and GO:0106340, and they are greatly overlapping (most correspond to PTHR10920; others are either named 'tRNA (cytidine(32)/guanosine(34)-2'-O)-methyltransferase' and/or annotated to Rhea 42396. So @raymond91125 please go ahead with the plan you propose above. Thanks, Pascale |
EC:2.1.1.205 appears to be eukaryotic whereas EC:2.1.1.200 prokaryotic. Though should we create EC:2.1.1.200 tRNA (cytidine(32)/uridine(32)-2'-O)-methyltransferase activity right now before there is a request? |
Yes I think this is what @raymond91125 had said in the proposal above |
Also moved never_in Archaea from GO:0106339 to GO:0106340. |
Added a tRNA methyltransferase activity; fixes #28550
+[Term] |
This is the first time I see this: RHEA has an OR in a reaction:
https://www.rhea-db.org/rhea/42396
This is an exact match to EC:2.1.1.205 tRNA (cytidine(32)/guanosine(34)-2'-O)-methyltransferase, but GO has 2 reactions.
However this one here is different, and RHEA created 2 reactions:
I think we should align with EC and have both substrates in the same reaction, for each of these 2 ECs.
@sjm41 what do you think ?
Thanks, Pascale
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: