-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New QC check- ensure that EC xrefs exist #29320
Labels
Comments
github-project-automation
bot
moved this to Todo
in Ontology technical essentials and proactive maintenance
Nov 28, 2024
balhoff
moved this from Todo
to Next tasks
in Ontology technical essentials and proactive maintenance
Dec 2, 2024
@pgaudet I implemented the check in #29372. However it found an error that appears to be "on purpose"; EC:1.14.13.253 is not published yet on Expasy (#29305 (comment)). Should we make a policy for this? |
Previous discussion: #27997 |
Right, the GO policy is that we use Expasy as the source of truth. |
Hi @balhoff |
pgaudet
changed the title
New QC check- ensure that xrefs exist
New QC check- ensure that EC xrefs exist
Dec 9, 2024
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from Next tasks
to Done
in Ontology technical essentials and proactive maintenance
Dec 9, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi @balhoff
See comment here:
#27532 (comment)
We had a xref to a non-existing EC term. We should have look up lists to make sure that we only use valid ECs (I think we already have that for RHEA?
Thanks, Pascale
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: