-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use modified version of WordNet #7
Comments
Hi ! So, it's true that we currently rely a lot on the WordNet hierarchy. If you want to use another sense inventory, here are some tips:
I know that it would be great to have a clear interface, to use any sense inventory, and it's not too difficult, but I don't have the time to do the changes right now, however it's planned for 2020 (after I finish my PhD actually ^^). |
Hi, fellow PhD student here, hoping to finish in 2020 too. I decided to sidestep the issue for now by using sense compression. The TRIPS ontology has mappings from WordNet, so I'm just replacing the hypernym compression algorithm with TRIPS compression. That does violate the invariant that was described in the paper (that no compression should result in losing a unique wordsense) but it seems to be working pretty well. |
If I wanted to use my own modified version of WordNet, or perhaps a different hierarchy with this system, where would I start?
I notice that the java code uses JWI, but I'm trying to figure out if the core system actually needs the full wordnet hierarchy or just the tags.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: