Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Admin: Add DotNet tests for SQS #8323

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 16, 2024

Conversation

bblommers
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@bblommers bblommers added this to the 5.0.21 milestone Nov 16, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.57%. Comparing base (10bdd08) to head (cba36e2).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #8323   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.57%   94.57%           
=======================================
  Files        1159     1159           
  Lines      100936   100936           
=======================================
  Hits        95458    95458           
  Misses       5478     5478           
Flag Coverage Δ
servertests 28.89% <ø> (ø)
unittests 94.54% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@bblommers bblommers merged commit 114e344 into getmoto:master Nov 16, 2024
52 of 53 checks passed
@bblommers bblommers deleted the admin-dotnet-test-for-sqs branch November 16, 2024 14:28
@maheshtirumerla
Copy link

Code block is not throwing any exception and its just returning the NULL.

@bblommers
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@maheshtirumerla Then I don't know what's going on. Moto thinks everything is OK (considering it returns the 200-responses), and as you can see in this PR, creating a queue does work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants