Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: only run soak tests on master branch #1320

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2024

Conversation

alxndrsn
Copy link
Contributor

@alxndrsn alxndrsn commented Dec 4, 2024

Spun off from #1315.

Soak tests are slow, and are only likely to break occasionally. Re-enabling them on branches when working on specific features, e.g. slonik or pg upgrades, would be sensible.

What has been done to verify that this works as intended?

Why is this the best possible solution? Were any other approaches considered?

Another option might be to also run if there are changes in package.json or package-lock.json.

How does this change affect users? Describe intentional changes to behavior and behavior that could have accidentally been affected by code changes. In other words, what are the regression risks?

No effect.

Does this change require updates to the API documentation? If so, please update docs/api.yaml as part of this PR.

No.

Before submitting this PR, please make sure you have:

  • run make test and confirmed all checks still pass OR confirm CircleCI build passes
  • verified that any code from external sources are properly credited in comments or that everything is internally sourced

Spun off from getodk#1315.

Soak tests are slow, and are only likely to break occasionally.  Re-enabling them on branches when working on specific features, e.g. `slonik` or `pg` upgrades, would be sensible.
@alxndrsn alxndrsn merged commit bafc0e3 into getodk:master Dec 5, 2024
1 check passed
@alxndrsn alxndrsn deleted the soak-tests-master-only branch December 5, 2024 04:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants