new syntax for looping n times without needing a variable #5938
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
See #1282. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
This is being tracked in #1282. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
suppose you want to do something n times, but dont need to track how many times you've done it.
currently the syntax is
for _n in n:or maybefor _n in range(n)not sure.how about
for n:?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions