Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

All the little things #57

Open
davelab6 opened this issue Aug 2, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

All the little things #57

davelab6 opened this issue Aug 2, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@davelab6
Copy link
Member

davelab6 commented Aug 2, 2024

As per #55 I just compared the RF release vs the latest RFA2 pushed an hour ago in typeroof, and I see great progress :) Yet there are many "little details" I'd like to propose changing, such as the smoothness of the curve on the bottom edge of t that is flat in the current RFA2, the flat edge of the left most side of the counter of d and g, the flaring at the end of g, and so on.

Screenshot 2024-08-02 at 5 01 35 PM Screenshot 2024-08-02 at 5 01 31 PM

Overall there are some changes from the RF to RFA2 design, that @dberlow says are true improvements and nudging them closer to the original (like the stroke width of e crossbar) would actually be undesirable, but that it would be best for me to go over all these little details directly with @sannorozco on a call next to discuss next week :)

image

@sannorozco
Copy link
Collaborator

@davelab6 yesss, let me know when you want to have the meeting 🙂.

@davelab6
Copy link
Member Author

davelab6 commented Aug 9, 2024

Looking at the latest file pushed 15h ago, at the opsz max wght max wdth max, a few things I noticed on typeroof

  • tail of y can be smoother
Screenshot 2024-08-09 at 11 02 37 AM
  • S looks pinched, and (with s) may be too wide in context of other caps
Screenshot 2024-08-09 at 11 04 56 AM
  • C seems too wide in context of other caps
Screenshot 2024-08-09 at 11 05 20 AM

@davelab6
Copy link
Member Author

davelab6 commented Aug 9, 2024

With opsz max wght max wdth min, typeroof:

  • Z seems too narrow in context of other caps
  • the spacing of the glyphs with diagonals seems inconsistent, with some that overlap together and some that do not
Screenshot 2024-08-09 at 11 10 52 AM
  • c aperture seems quite open compared to others, could be tighter to match /a/e/g
Screenshot 2024-08-09 at 11 14 12 AM

https://fontbureau.github.io/TypeRoof/#2024-08-09T17:16:15Z;RobotoAvar2%20Regular,Version%203.000;;;;opsz144,wdth25,wght100;0;12;144;l;01;;0;1;@v2:waterfall

With opsz max wght min wdth min, typeroof:

  • I wonder if the avar2 approach allows us to collapse the tittles at this extreme so they are as narrow as the stem stroke thickness, and don't stick out as dark spots
Screenshot 2024-08-09 at 11 16 35 AM

It seems at wght 150 the 'dark spots' effect melts away, but even 100 has it.

Screenshot 2024-08-09 at 11 19 28 AM

With opsz max wght min wdth max, typeroof

  • The G and C has a slight stroke weight thinning at the lower right, and D is slightly thicker, compared to the other strokes overall (/J/O/S). (This is already a masterpiece btw :)
Screenshot 2024-08-09 at 11 21 20 AM

@davelab6
Copy link
Member Author

davelab6 commented Aug 9, 2024

With opsz max wght min wdth 50, typeroof:

  • K and W diagonal strokes are a little thick
  • Z diagonal stroke is a little thin
Screenshot 2024-08-09 at 11 25 00 AM
  • m first stem/arch join, y tail, are thin and drop out
  • 4 diagonal, 8 center join, also (even when blown up big)
  • 4 top is a little thick when blown up
Screenshot 2024-08-09 at 11 27 18 AM Screenshot 2024-08-09 at 11 28 40 AM

sannorozco added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 9, 2024
—Less wide CGOQS
—tiny dot i & j to avoid darkspots
sannorozco added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 12, 2024
—Wider Z
—y terminal
—Y
sannorozco added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 12, 2024
—CDG.
—spacing VWXY.
sannorozco added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 13, 2024
—/S from weights and widths
sannorozco added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 14, 2024
—fixed 144 25 100
@davelab6
Copy link
Member Author

Great progress! 8 point structure at 144 151 100 still funky :)
Screenshot 2024-08-16 at 2 07 33 AM

sannorozco added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 17, 2024
—8 interpolations after many tries
sannorozco added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 19, 2024
—m interpolations progress
sannorozco added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 20, 2024
@davelab6
Copy link
Member Author

8 looking good at 144 151 100

Screenshot 2024-08-23 at 9 12 56 AM

sannorozco added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 23, 2024
sannorozco added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 26, 2024
sannorozco added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 26, 2024
sannorozco added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 26, 2024
sannorozco added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 27, 2024
sannorozco added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 27, 2024
@davelab6
Copy link
Member Author

davelab6 commented Sep 6, 2024

Only small thing I see now is y at 144 100 151

Screenshot 2024-09-06 at 9 12 23 AM

sannorozco added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants