-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
Counterarguments
Just a page to collect my counterarguments when I spot something which I believe deserve countering.
I heard this argument so often from apologists of bloated software that I decided to give the counterargument its own page.
uBlock supports the parsing/enforcing of hosts files, and ships with a couple of them. One of them, "Peter Lowe’s Ad server list" is enabled out of the box.
Using a hosts file at OS level rather than uBlock level is definitely the better solution for lists of malware domain, since these malware-linked domains would be blocked system-wide at OS level, and all applications would benefit from it.
However, for lists of domain linked to ad servers, trackers, analytics, etc., this is not a good solution: You can't easily un-break web pages with a hosts file at OS level.
With hosts file under control of uBlock, it is possible to un-break web sites: a user can just disable uBlock for the web site which breaks, or an exception filter can be created to counter the blocking of a specific hostname appearing in a hosts file.
Many of the exception filters in "uBlock filters" are actually exception filters to counter entries in the hosts files shipped with uBlock.
I want the project to be committed to fully support the hosts files which ship with uBlock, i.e. report any issues arising from using these, and appropriate exception filters will be created.
I personally use all of these hosts files, and so far not much breakage.
No. Code is wholly original, it was written from scratch. There are a very few places I borrowed code from elsewhere, and this is clearly identified. For example, for the element picker, I embedded CSS.escape from Mathias Bynens (because Chromium doesn't support yet CSS.escape).
No it's not. Adblock Edge is like Adblock Plus, except that notably it doesn't have the "Acceptable ads" exception filters out of the box. See for yourself: here is a diff of a code change for Adblock Edge, and here is the same exact diff for Adblock Plus. The timestamps shows that Adblock Edge pulled code changes from the Adblock Plus project.
uBlock Origin - An efficient blocker for Chromium and Firefox. Fast and lean.
- Wiki home
- About the Wiki documentation
- Permissions
- Privacy policy
- Info:
- The toolbar icon
- The popup user interface
- The context menu
-
Dashboard
- Settings pane
- Filter lists pane
- My filters pane
- My rules pane
- Trusted sites pane
- Keyboard shortcuts
- The logger
- Element picker
- Element zapper
-
Blocking mode
- Very easy mode
- Easy mode (default)
- Medium mode (optimal for advanced users)
- Hard mode
- Nightmare mode
- Strict blocking
- Few words about re-design of uBO's user interface
- Reference answers to various topics seen in the wild
- Overview of uBlock's network filtering engine
- uBlock's blocking and protection effectiveness:
- uBlock's resource usage and efficiency:
- Memory footprint: what happens inside uBlock after installation
- uBlock vs. ABP: efficiency compared
- Counterpoint: Who cares about efficiency, I have 8 GB RAM and|or a quad core CPU
- Debunking "uBlock Origin is less efficient than Adguard" claims
- Myth: uBlock consumes over 80MB
- Myth: uBlock is just slightly less resource intensive than Adblock Plus
- Myth: uBlock consumes several or several dozen GB of RAM
- Various videos showing side by side comparison of the load speed of complex sites
- Own memory usage: benchmarks over time
- Contributed memory usage: benchmarks over time
- Can uBO crash a browser?
- Tools, tests
- Deploying uBlock Origin
- Proposal for integration/unit testing
- uBlock Origin Core (Node.js):
- Troubleshooting:
- Good external guides:
- Scientific papers