Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Determine a good abstraction for simulation tests #11

Open
irapha opened this issue Feb 21, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Determine a good abstraction for simulation tests #11

irapha opened this issue Feb 21, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@irapha
Copy link
Member

irapha commented Feb 21, 2017

It'd be interesting to have some abstraction that handles some of the simulation testing needs. For instance, making sure that a robot reaches a certain region of the world within some timeout, or making sure that a robot doesn't touch obstacles when moving, etc.

This is going to warrant a considerable amount of discussion, since getting this abstraction right, and in a generalizable way (that works for more than just buzzmobile) is very important.

Because testing the framework currently relies on our experience developing buzzmobile, I'd say this issue is somewhat blocked by gtagency/buzzmobile#183. Until we have actually made worlds and scenarios with pass/fail conditions, it'll be hard to determine a good abstraction.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant