Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docker: Version of GLIBC dependencies is not met #492

Open
MrIsak opened this issue Sep 8, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #606
Open

Docker: Version of GLIBC dependencies is not met #492

MrIsak opened this issue Sep 8, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #606
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@MrIsak
Copy link

MrIsak commented Sep 8, 2023

Describe the bug

When building docker image from repo's Dockerfile, execution of dalfox gives

./dalfox: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.34' not found (required by ./dalfox)
./dalfox: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.32' not found (required by ./dalfox)

Version of GLIBC dependencies is not met in debian:buster as the Dockerfile specify.
debian:bookworm is needed to satisfy dalfox requirements

Environment

  • Dalfox Version: 290
  • Installed from: Cloned repo & docker build
@MrIsak MrIsak added the bug Something isn't working label Sep 8, 2023
@HendrikSchrieber
Copy link

Same issue with pre-built docker image from GitHub:
/app/dalfox: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version GLIBC_2.34' not found (required by /app/dalfox)
/app/dalfox: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version GLIBC_2.32' not found (required by /app/dalfox)

@hahwul
Copy link
Owner

hahwul commented Dec 7, 2024

@HendrikSchrieber @MrIsak
Sorry for the late reply, and thank you for reporting the issue. Could you try again with the main image?

git clone https://github.com/hahwul/dalfox
cd dalfox

docker build . -t dalfox_test
docker run -it dalfox_test bash
# ./dalfox

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants