-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Question regarding Relationship Modeling #16
Comments
Hi, The region queries have different supervision. Split the image to 10x10 patches, then we have 10x10=100 region queries, and a 10x10 mini-map. If the (3, 6)-th image patch contains object while (6, 8)-th image patch doesn't, the label for the (3, 6)-th region query on the mini-map is set to 1, whereas the label for the (6, 8)-th region query is set to 0. I hope this example clarifies the process for you. Thank you! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
According to this paragraph, region-based queries are supervised by mini-map down-sampled from the ground truth. If I understand correctly, all the queries then have the same supervision. If so, how can these queries learn to correspond to different regions? Wouldn't they learn the same thing and correspond to the same region?
Can you kindly explain more about this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: