Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Figure out why Flux.delayElements() and Mono.delayElement() break the HeatPump #279

Open
climategadgets opened this issue Sep 7, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Figure out why Flux.delayElements() and Mono.delayElement() break the HeatPump #279

climategadgets opened this issue Sep 7, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
annoyance reactive Pertinent to Reactive branches only stable-not-affected Issues with this label affect only the development branches

Comments

@climategadgets
Copy link
Member

Expected Behavior

Using Flux.delayElements() or Mono.delayElement() works as documented.

Actual Behavior

It doesn't. Observed behavior is - next element from the flux is being emitted while the delay is underway.
@climategadgets climategadgets added annoyance stable-not-affected Issues with this label affect only the development branches reactive Pertinent to Reactive branches only labels Sep 7, 2023
climategadgets added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 7, 2023
@climategadgets
Minor non-destructive refactoring (#271, #279)
e8f700c
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
annoyance reactive Pertinent to Reactive branches only stable-not-affected Issues with this label affect only the development branches
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@climategadgets