You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Many revisited mortality trees don't have DIA recorded (at least in western states), which leads tpa() to do some dramatic under-counting when type="all" or "dead". I can understand the reasoning behind this choice, especially when estimating anything other than TPA. One solution would be to include these trees in TPA estimates, and use PREVDIA (with a disclaimer) when necessary.
Possibly not a problem many people will run into, but thought it worth pointing out!
Thanks,
Daniel Perret
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Many revisited mortality trees don't have DIA recorded (at least in western states), which leads tpa() to do some dramatic under-counting when type="all" or "dead". I can understand the reasoning behind this choice, especially when estimating anything other than TPA. One solution would be to include these trees in TPA estimates, and use PREVDIA (with a disclaimer) when necessary.
Possibly not a problem many people will run into, but thought it worth pointing out!
Thanks,
Daniel Perret
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: