From e0233ebc3ce4791d094c52eeef81cce78b9bc578 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Douglas Scott Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 10:19:28 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fix `Command::perform` to return a `Command` This seems like clearly the correct thing to do here. If the type bound on `Command` isn't specified, it makes no difference, since the generic is inferred in a way that works with either definition. But this is important if `Command` is aliased with a concrete type. --- runtime/src/command.rs | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/runtime/src/command.rs b/runtime/src/command.rs index cd4c51ff05..b74097bdfc 100644 --- a/runtime/src/command.rs +++ b/runtime/src/command.rs @@ -40,9 +40,9 @@ impl Command { /// Creates a [`Command`] that performs the action of the given future. pub fn perform( - future: impl Future + 'static + MaybeSend, - f: impl FnOnce(T) -> A + 'static + MaybeSend, - ) -> Command { + future: impl Future + 'static + MaybeSend, + f: impl FnOnce(A) -> T + 'static + MaybeSend, + ) -> Command { use iced_futures::futures::FutureExt; Command::single(Action::Future(Box::pin(future.map(f))))