Ignore time step in exodiff? #16792
-
Hi all, I'm trying to create a test that makes sure a pseudo-transient simulation reaches the same physical results regardless of whether a MOOSE-wrapped app is subcycled or has a time step that matches the master app's time step. To reach the same steady state tolerance, however, requires a different number of time steps (as expected) when different subcycling approaches are used. For my subcycled test, I'm reusing the gold file from the non-subcycled case. How can I ignore the time step for my Exodiff type test? I tried adding a blank
Basically, I want this test to pass b/c I don't care about the simulation time:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
If it's just one timestep, you can use See page 13 for other ideas: https://ftp.mcs.anl.gov/pub/pdetools/nightlylogs/xsdk/xsdk-configuration-tester/packages/trilinos/packages/seacas/doc/exo_util.pdf |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
If it's just one timestep, you can use
-TM
in exodiff to compare the closest timesteps.See page 13 for other ideas: https://ftp.mcs.anl.gov/pub/pdetools/nightlylogs/xsdk/xsdk-configuration-tester/packages/trilinos/packages/seacas/doc/exo_util.pdf