Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SYCL][DOC] Expand complex extension with complex support for sycl::marray #11792

Conversation

jle-quel
Copy link
Contributor

@jle-quel jle-quel commented Nov 6, 2023

This PR is the updated version of the "complex support for sycl::marray" extension, which used to be a separate extension.
However, after discussing whether it should be a separate extension versus an expansion (#8852), the complex expansion has been decided.

Following the proposal for sycl::ext::oneapi::experimental::complex which adds the support of complex for SYCL, this expansion proposes to incorporate complex support for sycl::marray and new complex math features.

@gmlueck @steffenlarsen

Implementation: #8647

@jle-quel jle-quel requested a review from a team as a code owner November 6, 2023 14:45
Copy link
Contributor

@steffenlarsen steffenlarsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a couple comments, but otherwise it looks good to me.

@jle-quel jle-quel force-pushed the jle-quel/extend-complex-experimental-extension branch from 3e8c2b4 to 7b498bb Compare January 11, 2024 10:27
@jle-quel jle-quel force-pushed the jle-quel/extend-complex-experimental-extension branch from 7b498bb to 261c638 Compare January 11, 2024 10:29
@jle-quel
Copy link
Contributor Author

@steffenlarsen @gmlueck
Thank you for being so patient on this PR.
I added a couple of new commits to apply the feedback received.
I believe this extension is now in a mergeable state, let me know otherwise.

Copy link
Contributor

@steffenlarsen steffenlarsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@jle-quel
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do you have any feedback that could postpone the merge of this extension @gmlueck?

Copy link
Contributor

@Pennycook Pennycook left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@gmlueck is out of the office, so I've taken a quick at this. Just a few changes, I think.

@jle-quel
Copy link
Contributor Author

jle-quel commented Feb 7, 2024

If there are no more blockers, we could be able to move forward with this extension and merge it. What do you people think?

@dm-vodopyanov
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @jle-quel, there is a process of merging PRs, PR author can ask @intel/llvm-gatekeepers team to merge it:

Feel free to ping @intel/llvm-gatekeepers if your PR is green and can be merged.

https://github.com/intel/llvm/blob/sycl/CONTRIBUTING.md#merge

@dm-vodopyanov dm-vodopyanov merged commit 32f5191 into intel:sycl Feb 7, 2024
3 checks passed
@jle-quel jle-quel deleted the jle-quel/extend-complex-experimental-extension branch February 7, 2024 11:20
sergey-semenov pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2024
…12649)

This PR apply the modifications asked in the
#11792 PR made by @Pennycook

---------

Co-authored-by: John Pennycook <john.pennycook@intel.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants